{"id":4236,"date":"2017-06-26T05:00:04","date_gmt":"2017-06-26T12:00:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/markreads.net\/reviews\/?p=4236"},"modified":"2017-06-25T09:45:37","modified_gmt":"2017-06-25T16:45:37","slug":"mark-reads-the-truth-part-15","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/markreads.net\/reviews\/2017\/06\/mark-reads-the-truth-part-15\/","title":{"rendered":"Mark Reads ‘The Truth’: Part 15"},"content":{"rendered":"

In the fifteenth part of The Truth<\/i>, William stops someone following him, while the dwarfs discover who is actually<\/i> running The Inquirer<\/i>. Intrigued? Then it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s time for Mark to read Discworld<\/i>.\u00c2\u00a0<\/p>\n

OH NO to A LOT OF THINGS.<\/p>\n

Angua<\/b><\/p>\n

I just feel bad<\/i> for her. I understood William\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s reasoning for trying to get the Watch off his scent (hehehe), and Pratchett builds that case believably. William doesn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t want to be prodded or controlled by anyone<\/i>, and at the very least, being watched and surveilled is unnerving regardless of the reason. I JUST FEEL AWFUL FOR ANGUA BECAUSE THIS HAD TO BE A HORRIFIC EXPERIENCE.<\/p>\n

Can we also just appreciate that William doubled down on the claim that Nobby was the werewolf in the Watch? Because oh my gods<\/i>, that whole conversation between William and Gaspode is full of double meanings and unsaid things. I think there\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s something to Gaspode focusing on the whole terrier detail, but, as I said, he doesn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t spell it out. I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m also curious how the hell Gaspode is going to deal with \u00e2\u20ac\u0153translating\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Wuffles because\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 people can\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t translate dog??? Also, I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t even know where the hell Wuffles is! Does Gaspode? HOW THE HELL COULD THEY POSSIBLY PUT GASPODE IN A DISGUISE?<\/p>\n

The Truth<\/b><\/p>\n

I didn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t expect a major plot twist from the scene where the dwarfs broke into the neighboring basement of The Inquirer<\/i>. First of all, I didn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t even think they\u00e2\u20ac\u2122d get very far because surely someone<\/i> important would be down there to stop them. Maybe they\u00e2\u20ac\u2122d see their presses! Maybe it was storage. Dibbler was NOWHERE ON MY RADAR, and yet, he\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s the most logical person to be head writer for The Inquirer<\/i> because the stories are just like his wares: pure garbage. Of course, the stories sell way<\/i> better than his sausage-inna-bun, so a part of me (only slightly) respects that he finally<\/i> found something that makes him real money. Well\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t actually know if he makes money from this, but I assume he does. Why else would he stick around?<\/p>\n

Regardless, I loved<\/i> the scene where Sacharissa and William confronted Dibbler over his work. Through this, Pratchett skewers tabloid \u00e2\u20ac\u0153journalism\u00e2\u20ac\u009d and the sort of sensationalized storytelling that thrives in our own world. I know that there\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s long been a huge problem with tabloids in the UK, perhaps even worse than what we have here in America. So there are cultural differences here, and I believe<\/i> the legal ramifications are different, too. Even so, with the save of \u00e2\u20ac\u0153fake news\u00e2\u20ac\u009d that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s been sullying all of our lives, there is still a prescience to Pratchett\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s satire. There are people who justify what they do by using Dibbler\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s logic: people can make up their own minds, right? Who cares what\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s put out in the world? \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Reasonable\u00e2\u20ac\u009d people can determine the difference between truth and fiction!<\/p>\n

Except I consider myself pretty discerning, and I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve been tricked by fake news and gossip. Part of that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s because it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s getting better<\/i> at seeming real. But humans have so many biases and lenses at work that it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s inevitable. So is the responsibility on the people who consume the stories or those who create them?<\/p>\n

It\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a bit of both, I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122d say, but in this case, shifting all the responsibility to the reader is highly, highly immoral, and I think Dibbler knows it. But perhaps he agreed to start working for William because he also<\/i> sees dollar signs everywhere, you know?<\/p>\n

Seriously, how is this meeting between William and Gaspode going to transpire???<\/p>\n

http:\/\/youtu.be\/_7bLVjCwOVk?a<\/p>\n

Mark Links Stuff<\/b><\/p>\n

-\u00c2\u00a0Please visit my new site for all announcements<\/a>. If you’d rather not have to rely on checking a website regularly, sign up for my newsletter instead<\/a>! This will cover all news for Mark Reads, Mark Watches, and my fiction releases.\u00c2\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"